The Case for the Right to Housing in Rural Areas

Housing is a basic human need that provides stability and security. The right to housing ensures that everyone, regardless of location, has access to shelter. However, absent housing, it destroys any possibilities of economic development, ruining business attractions and creating worker retention.  

Economic Sense

Affordable housing in rural areas directly revitalizes local economics by attracting residents who support small businesses and stimulate consumer spending.

The development and maintenance of these homes create essential jobs, boosting employment and income within the community. It also encourages population retention and prevents the decline of rural communities. With stable housing, residents and community members can focus on education, leading to a more skilled workforce that contributes to long-term growth.

Does It Really Help Rural Areas?

In countries like Finland and Scotland, implementing strong housing policies has improved the lives of people in rural communities. It has strengthened community ties; allowing families to thrive, supporting better health, and boosting educational outcomes.

It also addresses the issue of housing inequality. In many places, rural communities are overlooked when it comes to infrastructure and resources, leading to significant disparities. However, right to housing means that location and economic status are no longer the driving factor in one's living conditions, leading to more equitable societies.

Final Thoughts

Some argue that polices could lead to increased taxes and difficulties in managing widespread rural developments.

While these concerns are valid, well-planned policies and investments can be used to fund housing projects, and investing in rural infrastructure can ensure that developments are sustainable and beneficial for everyone in long-term